HOME   
   NEWS   
   BUSINESS   
   CRICKET   
   SPORTS   
   MOVIES   
   NET GUIDE   
   SHOPPING   
   BLOGS  
   ASTROLOGY  
   MATCHMAKER  


Search:



The Web

Rediff








News
Capital Buzz
Commentry
Dear Rediff
Diary
Elections
Interviews
Specials
Gallery
The States



Home > News > Report

US attack on Iraq unlikely till end of Haj

Shahid K Abbas in New Delhi | January 19, 2003 07:38 IST

The Haj pilgrimage, which is scheduled to begin mid-February, is likely to delay an American attack on Iraq till at least March.

Nearly 2.5 million Muslims from all over the world converge on three cities -- Mecca, Medina and Arafat -- of Saudi Arabia, an ally of the United States and Iraq's neighbour, for the Haj pilgrimage around this time of the year.

More than the threat to their lives, an US attack on Iraq at this time might spark off an immediate reaction in the Gulf, which the US-friendly governments may find difficult to control.

"If the US attacks Iraq, the governments several nations in the Gulf may rally behind US. But the masses would support Iraq," Mohammad Afzal, a former Rajya Sabha member, who had served on the board of the Indian Haj Committee for several years, told rediff.com.

"If even one fourth of the total people assembled in Saudi Arabia decide to voice their protest, it would become difficult for the Saudi Arabian government to tackle the situation?" he said.

"The US would not act in a haste and precipitate a crisis that could antagonise its friends among the Islamic governments whose support it is actively seeking to launch an attack on Iraq," Afzal said.

US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld recently said that despite a large build-up of the US military in the Gulf region, the use of force against Iraq was possible but not inevitable.

"Our first choice would be that (Iraq president) Saddam Hussein would pack up and leave the country. That will be nice for everybody. Or, he would turn over a new leaf and cooperate with the UN and disgorge all his (military) capabilities," he told reporters.

He also said that US President George W Bush had not yet decided to use force against Iraq, but the continuing flow of American troops to the region lend him flexibility while dealing with the Iraqi president.

Notably, the US-led strikes on Taliban-ruled Afghanistan that started in October 2001 and which, barring Iran, enjoyed worldwide support, were suspended during the Muslim holy month of Ramzan (some time in November-December), when devout Muslims observe a dawn-to-dusk fast.

Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 7




Sub: INCORRECT NEWS

For your ignorant reporters kind information, the US attack on Afghanistan was NOT interrupted during Ramzan (nor should it have been) In fact Donald Rumsfeld ...


Posted by Gkrish5





Sub: Hajj is like Ramadan

Each year the US is about to give a country the "full treatment" Muslims say things like "the US wouldn't dare attack during Ramadan" or ...


Posted by Brad Arnold





Sub: WAR BENEFITS NONE

We are now in the 21st century and are still so uneducated and remote as compared to animals and creatures that co exist in our ...


Posted by True Indian





Sub: Invasion on America

America still thinks that it heads the World, How wrong they are ? they must learn the lesson that their end has begun and the ...


Posted by Imtiaz





Sub: WAR AND AMERICA

I strongly belive that america should not attack iraq .the whole world knows the plan of the americans.they just want to take over the control ...


Posted by mohammed abdul fazil




Disclaimer




Article Tools

Email this Article

Printer-Friendly Format

Letter to the Editor



Related Stories


'Donations by Pak expats vanish'








HOME   
   NEWS   
   BUSINESS   
   CRICKET   
   SPORTS   
   MOVIES   
   NET GUIDE   
   SHOPPING   
   BLOGS  
   ASTROLOGY  
   MATCHMAKER  
© 2003 rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.