Home > News > Report

'Who is Mufti to decide who I marry?'

Syed Firdaus Ashraf in Mumbai | March 12, 2004 19:46 IST
Last Updated: March 12, 2004 21:09 IST


Women from Jammu and Kashmir married to 'outsiders' and settled in Mumbai have expressed strong reservations against the Permanent Residents (Disqualification) Bill passed in the state assembly this week.

The bill seeks to bar women from Jammu and Kashmir who have married non-locals from inheriting property in the state.

Also read: J&K's perverse legislation

"Why discriminate against women?" asks Yasmin Sheikh, a 26-year-old Srinagar resident married to a Mumbai-born journalist. "What wrong did they do? Why are we being treated like second-class citizens? The government's objective is so shameful that it is not possible for me to describe it in words," she adds.

"If my husband needs money after my death then he cannot sell my father's property to support himself," points out  Sakina Khan, who is married to a travel agent. "This is also applicable to my children. I think (J&K Chief Minister) Mufti Mohammed Sayeed should rethink the matter," she says.

In an interview to rediff.com on Tuesday, Mehbooba Mufti, president of the People's Democratic Party and the Mufti's daughter, said, "What we had done was merely to reintroduce the bill in the House, which seeks to protect the rights of the state subjects over their properties. This bill was introduced by Maharaja Hari Singh at the instance of Kashmiri Pandits and the Dogras of Jammu who felt that outsiders married their women in order to grab their properties."

But the Mumbai-based Kashmiris say they are surprised that the same rules will not apply to men in case the bill, which has now been referred to a select committee of the J&K legislature, becomes law.

"Kashmiri girls never dreamt of marrying someone from Jammu 20 years ago," says Pratibha Sharma, who works in Bollywood and is married to a Punjabi. "They only married people from Kashmir. But they are now forced to marry people from outside the state as many of them left the valley after militancy broke out," she adds.

She feels Kashmir Pandit girls "will suffer the most because of this bill. There are hardly any Kashmiri Pandit girls living in Kashmir. The chances are that many of them will end up marrying people from other states."

"It is better to marry a person I know rather than marry a Kashmiri I don't know. Who is Mufti Mohammed Sayeed to decide who I should marry?" asks Sakina Khan.

Some names have been changed to protect the women's identities


Article Tools
Email this article
Print this article
Write us a letter



Related Stories


Don't violate rights: Mufti

Kashmiri separatist Thakur dies

Govt tries to salvage J&K talks



People Who Read This Also Read


Rahul, Priyanka leave for Pak

Rumsfeld meets General Vij







More reports from Jammu and Kashmir




Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 11




Sub: this is injustice!

It is very unfair that women are being discriminated against even now and that too openly. I am not a Kashmiri, but I feel for ...


Posted by pm





Sub: Women Bill in JK

I think the politicians in the velly are more concerned with their future rather then the future of the people and the state.


Posted by Manoj Khatod





Sub: I support this bill

Ma'am, Let me tell you that you are over-reacting to something which is a norm internationally. Suppose your husband was from United States and not ...


Posted by shanes09





Sub: why does discrimination always apply only to women?

The new rule brought out by Mufti is very Anti-women. I support the view of certain women that it is the individual that decides who ...


Posted by lorraine d\'costa





Sub: Anti Country

This bill which Mufti CM of J&K is trying to introduce is nothing just ANTI INDIA. This is nothing just to Appease the pak terrorist ...


Posted by jagannath Rao




Disclaimer







Copyright © 2003 rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.