Home > US Edition > The Gulf War II > Reuters > Report

Blix slams US, Britain on Iraq WMDs

Grant McCool in New York | June 24, 2003 23:51 IST


The longer the United States and Britain occupy Iraq without finding weapons of mass destruction, the more conceivable it is that Baghdad destroyed them after the first Gulf War in 1991, chief United Nations weapons inspector Hans Blix said on Monday.

Blix, to retire next week after heading inspections before the US-led war on Iraq began in March, also spoke critically at a think tank meeting of one of Washington's key arguments for overthrowing Iraq President Saddam Hussein.

"It is sort of fascinating that you can have 100 per cent certainty about weapons of mass destruction and zero certainty of about where they are," Blix said at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.

Two months after the fall of Baghdad in a war launched after the United States and Britain accusing Saddam of illegally harboring nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, their troops still have not found any such weapons.

"I'm simply saying that the longer we are in this situation without finding anything, the more we have to ask ourselves is it conceivable that they did destroy in '91," Blix told Reuters Television after the event.

Saddam said the weapons were destroyed in 1991 when a US-led international coalition ousted his army from Kuwait. Blix has said that inspectors made their last significant finds in 1994.

Blix's UN inspectors searched for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq from November 2002 to March 2003. Some US officials faulted the Swede for failing to produce tougher reports on Iraq's purported weapons.

But on Monday, Blix took aim at the Bush administration's assertions that Washington needed more time to find Iraq's weapons.

"Three-and-a-half months for new inspections was a rather short time before calling it a day and especially when we now see the US government is saying that, 'look, you have to have a little patience, you know these things take time.' All right," Blix told his audience of foreign policy analysts, business leaders, academics and journalists.

Blix, retiring on June 30 after heading the UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission since March 2000, said he would like to write a 'nuanced view' of the period.

 


Article Tools

Email this Article

Printer-Friendly Format

Letter to the Editor



Related Stories


Bush backs Blair on Iraq

Iran accuses US of interference

Iraq reconstruction plan readied



People Who Read This Also Read


PM meets Indians in Beijing

Take up Ram issue: VHP to Dy PM

Army misbehaved: J&K minister




© Copyright 2003 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 6




Sub: US, Britain must apologize.

Both these countries should apologize to the world community for misinforming and misleading it, and raiding Iraq as its consequence. A compensation to be decided ...


Posted by chanakya





Sub: WMD's in Iraq

I feel USA and Britain made sure that Iraq didn't have any WMDs through UN inspection. It was only after UN didn't find any WMDs ...


Posted by SubratG





Sub: weapons of Modren democracy

Weapons of mass destruction are now a days weapons of modren democracy to be used against those states which do not cope with the designs ...


Posted by Rajinder Singh





Sub: was it ever a reason for war?

Was this 'chemical weapons issue' ever an authentic reason for war? We all know it wasn't! Its a naked truth that US is colonising the ...


Posted by amandeep





Sub: Blix slams US, Britain

It is surprising how ostrich-like the US citizens can be. Despite daily coverage in the media of how intelligence reports were tampered with to publicly ...


Posted by Onlooker




Disclaimer







Copyright © 2003 rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.